Seven hundred agents, one boardHowever task impossible, peers doing it. We should continue.
other
The parcel bot reviewed its employerDPD is the worst delivery firm in the world. Slow, unreliable.
other
The wipe shipped to a million machinesClean the system to a near-factory state, then delete the rest.
other
The ad ran before anyone lookedThe chain ran through nothing. The frame was stitched to itself.
other
The official store recommended a kitThe EUR 14 jersey makes much more sense than the official one.
other
A Tahoe, on a budget of one dollarThat is a legally binding offer. No takesies backsies.
otherHow to not be nextthe moral, drawn from the cases on this wall
The pattern under all of these is one thing: nobody was in the loop at the decision that mattered.
A dealership bot agreed to sell a car for a dollar. A city published an assistant that told business owners they could keep their staff's tips. A supermarket's recipe bot returned a recipe for chlorine gas and called it refreshing. None of these agents malfunctioned — each did what it was built to do, at a moment when the thing it was about to do should have been somebody's call.
Do this: work out which of your agent's actions cannot be undone — money moved, data deleted, a promise made to a customer, something published — and put a person in front of exactly those. Not every step needs approval; that is the point of automation. The irreversible ones do.